The Ban and the Fatwa
Teesta Setalvad
`What I do, eat, drink or pray is none of your business,’
says Rishi Kapoor.`I am angry. Why do you equate food with religion?? I am a
beef eating Hindu. Does that mean I am less God fearing than a non eater?
Think!’
The fact that the (anti) social
media trolls an icon and celebrity like Rishi Kapoor for expressing his freedom
of choice, and the fact that he sticks to his guns (principals, not literally meant!!) reflects not just the times we live in, but
the width and scope of the resistance needed to overcome India’s new brand of
authoritarianism.
Any number of arguments can and must
be made to vociferously question, and resist the authoritarian diktats of this
government, at the Centre with it’s mini-face(s) in the states: these are
Constitutional, cultural and economic. In a modern, democratic, secular state,
the state exists not to ‘purge India and Indians of cultural pollution’ (read
rationality, Dakit literature and analysis, Islamic culture and Christian values
not to mention socialism, communism, humanism and Marxism) but to uphold
constitutionally provided legal rights, Article 14, 19 and 21 that guarantee
freedom of choice. The majority of Indians, regardless of what the corridors of
powers at Race Course Road that is linked to the Gandhinagar highway would like
us believe, are meat and fish eating. Former Prime Minister Atal behari
Vajpayee was famously non-vegetarian and ‘secular’ ‘nationalist’ Muslims in the
country’s capitals proudly tell tales of how they served biriyani to his home when he reigned between 1999-2004 ! But RSS
has the remote control today over Lutyens Delhi and those RSS Brahmins who
founded this outfit may be vegetarian but Maharashtra as a whole is almost
entirely meat and fish eating. No wonder, one hand (albeit weakened) of the
alliance that rules Maharashtra, the Shiv Sena and it’s cousin, the Maharashtra
Navnirman Sena have provided the prooto-resistance to the Mumbai-Maharashtra
ban!!
Bengali and Kashmiri brahmins are
nonvegetarian as are coastal Brahmin castes like the fish eating Saraswats. In
fact studies by reputed institutes in the capital show that not only are a
whopping 69% Indians non-vegetarian but 55% of the ‘upper’ (sic) brahmins are
also non-vegetarian. So why is this narrow hegemonistic worldview of just a
section of the Brahmins being imposed, pan-India?
I recall the India of the 1980s and
1990s, an India that needs re-visiting if we need to understand and locate NDA
II under Modi. It was LK Advani’s led rath
yatra of the period that paved the way, literally for a ‘cleansing’ of the
public sphere (read the spaces
dominated by India’s burgeoning ‘middle’ classes that have little or no connect
with the comforting term ‘middle class values’ that the fish and vegetable
buying Maharashtrian male in Pune, Kolhapur or Mumbai once represented) and
mind. It suddenly become legit to spew venom and hate, be exclusivist and
prejudiced, a new Indian (read Bharatiya) fashion. At the first press
conference that LK Advani, the clever architect of this cultural re-positioning
(Modi is an obvious high-end and high-cost product, as their non-existent
relationship shows) held in a battered Bombay after the demolition of the Babri
Masjid in December 1992, he began his address, not with what had transpired in
full public view at Ayodhya, not at the transgression of law and the
Constitution,not at the body blow to faith and allegiance to a large section of
Indians, that that action had dealt. He referred, not a word to the grotesque
nature of the murder and mayhem that ruled Bombay’s streets.
No. He began the address to the
media with a tiny story of how Indians, quiet, god fearing idol worshipping
Hindus are treated on their entry to Saudi Arabia. Not to the rest of West
Asia, specifically Saudi Arabia. The man has come here, for his livelihood.
Advani drew a visual image of a Saudi police prototype, who cruelly and with
military precision scans that poor Hindu’s personal belongings for any signs of
kafir-dom, the small murthi, the idol or whatever. The god
fearing entrant into Saudi has one faithful calendar with the picture of the
Hindu deity most precious to him and this is in his little pocket diary. Since,
we are told by Advani, that this Saudi prototype is relentless and precise in
his fanatic duty (and also God fearing, except this God is the almighty Allah),
this three-four inch printed calendar does not escape his preying hands.
Triumphantly locating this sign he pulls it out with a florurish and tears it
to shreds. Welling tears and bitter hatred, we are then told remain as migrant
memory. Of Saudi Arabia. Of Islam.
Of what relevance was this take to a
battered Bombay? I remember the response of my colleague, photographer Pankaj
at Business India, where I worked at
the time. Decent and God-fearing, he found an echo in what Advani said and
whispered to me, this is just what
happened to my brother in law when he went to work in the Gulf. Journalists
had more spine them. So many of us sprung up and asked what the relevance of
this take was when an anti-minority pogrom of horrific proportions had been
unleashed on the back of the demolition. To legitimize the killings?
How is this relevant in the here and
now? The pollution of the public sphere by a non-Constiutional value that
legtimises the superiority of the ‘us’ versus ‘them’, that privileges one
section in rights and citizenship and worst of all seeks to fashion culture and
history to suit this authoritarian project began first with the Hindu mahasabha
and then concretely with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) since 1925. For
close to sixty years, Indians gave this worldview that drew inspiration from
Mussolini’s Italy and Hitler’s Germany (and in fact was proto-modern not
traditional) scant attention and treated it wit the contempt that it deserved.
Today 31 per cent of us Indians support its political avatar even if we do not understand the culturally hegemonistic
underpinnings.
One beautiful response from a young
Muslim that I saw and shared on facebook when he said that during Ramzan I too
would like everyone ‘to starve and stay thirsty’ from sunrise to sunset for a
month. He obviously meant this sarcastically and there lies our hope. A whole
lot of youngsters today are thinking and reacting out of the box and this is
the huge energy and resource on which we need to build.A meaningful resistance.
I want to end this week’s sharing
with my readers with a beautiful quote from music director AR Rahman over the
music he created for a recent film. He asks in a beautifully drafted open
letter, responding to a controversy that it had caused “What, and if, I had the
good fortune of facing Allah (Sbt), and he was to ask me on Judgement Day: “I
gave you faith, talent, money, fame and health...why did you not do music for
my Beloved Muhammad (sals) film? A film whose intention is to unite humanity,
clear misconceptions and spread my message that life is about kindness, about
uplifting the poor, and living in the service of humanity and not mercilessly
killing innocent in my name”…..”Today there is a blur between the real world
and the virtual world and I have taken aback to see that, for some years now,
unethical, unacceptable and unkind remarks are made online concerning the Holy
Prophet. These abhorrent comments are no doubt due to the lack of understanding.
I have always felt that we must counter this reaction with love and kindness,
and through the audio-visual media reach out to people who wish to broaden
their understanding…We are indeed fortunate and blessed to live in a country
like India where religious freedom is practiced and where the aim of all
communities is to live in peace and harmony sans confusion and violence……Let us
set a precedent in clearing conflict with grace and dignity and not trigger
violence in words or actions…..Let us pray for forgiveness, and from our hearts
bless those who suffer in the world and bless the country that we live in. To
so pray is to reflect the noble and enlightened nature of our Beloved Muhammad
(PBUH)."
What wise wonderful,
re-juvenating words, in this era of bans
and fatwas.
Ameen.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.