The peddling of Hate and...Good Governance
Teesta Setalvad
The scene has now shifted out of Delhi, 7 Race
Course Road, BJP’s Office at Ashoka Road and even South Block. Not surprising
the current favourite, that is the Minister for Human Resources Development
gets maximum press; as do some others but there is not much from news the MEA
(MS Sushma Swaraj). Another favourite is the MOS Commerce Nirmala Sitharaman.
But media pundits are silent over the
BJP, and the new government’s silence.
Key secretaries are mum. The noisy
newshour sees no anchors waiving surreptitiously leaked documents (RTI seems infra dig now) except of course the “leaked IB report on
the naughty, difficult policy questioning NGOS. That’s all the great ‘Nation
Wants to Know” channel could unearth probably because a whily MHA wanted him
to! But then he has no desire to expose the new government given all he did to
ensure the government was in place.
But despite this adoration, so far
there is no media advisor to the PM. The Press Information Bureau (PIB) has
hardly any information. Except a circular which says a special cell has been
set up to monitor the pro and anti PM Modi stories in the media. So now instead
of telling the public about government policy, PIB will be used to monitor the
‘friend’ and ‘enemies’ of the new regime. Surprise of surprise (ever heard the
dictum one individual is bigger than the organisation???), the Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP) has scrapped its daily briefing, which was the lifeline of the
political beat for many years. The RSS goes on speaking however be it on Sexual
Violence in Gujarat’s academic works or other historical treatsies through
Dinesh Batra’s Shiksha Bachao Andolan, Education will now be save from
rationality, from questioning, from a genuinely Indian, inquiry ethos of the
kind generated by Jyotiba Phule, Babasaheb Ambedkar, Maulana Azad. The new
regime prefers the autocratic approach “its my way or the highway” “Hindu upper
caste history is the only contribution of this civilization” not Shivaji who
was a loved ruler of the masses because of his lived pluralism:
What has stumped
hardcore political journalists in Delhi is that the numerous BJP media lovers
like Prakash Javedkar, now I & B minister, Ravi Shakar Prasad, India’s new
law minister (remember he appeared for the VHP in the Ayodhya matter and
emerged from the Court on September 30, 2010 waving a “V” for victory sign??),
and even Arun Jaitley, who sometimes spent the entire day in front of TV
cameras patiently answering questions ranging from politics to social propriety
and offering advice to the nation, at large, are nowhere to be seen. Maybe they
are finally working! Has the byte has gone out of the BJP ?
Action has shifted to the states who go to the
polls. There is almost no ‘national’ news from BJP ruled states even if there
is a Dalit self immolation or rape or corruption scandal. We only get news from
Maharashtra, West Bengal and never to forget, Uttar Pradesh.
The brutal kiiling of Mohsin Shaikh, a young
IT professional in cold blood after hatred was allowed to spill on the streets
on June 2, 2014 is an example of how hatred is allowed to fester unchecked.
Dhananjay Desai of the Hindu Rashtra Sena (who’s venomous bile can be heard
unchecked on the Youtube) has bee allowed to spread his poison unchecked in Goa
and Maharashtra (where a ‘secular’ Congress-NCP government rules. Twenty three
cases pending against him have not stopped in. Finally he has been booked; he
was also suspect number one in the Narayan Dabholkar killing but escaped due to
lack of evidence.
Shaikh's murder was a pure and
simple hate crime, one would have thought. But will the Maharashtra police
unequivocally book him and prosecute him or settle for the theory of
'action-reaction', a Hindutvawaadi theory that has percolated all institutions.
All Hindutvawadis describe their violence as 'defensive' or a 'reaction'
to violence by Muslims. The latter are always the initiators -- this is an
article of faith for Hindutvawadis. And the reaction is always bound to
be more than the action, since Hindus are the majority -- this was explained to
me by the late Adhik Shirodkar, the Shiv Sena's senior counsel before the
Srikrishna Commission of inquiry into the 1992-1993 Mumbai riots.
So here's the Pune police's
explanation for Shaikh's lynching. First, came the Facebook post derogatory to
Shivaji and Bal Thackeray. This was followed by stoning of mosques by offended
Hindutva activists. The Congress led a delegation of affected Muslims to
complain about the stoning. According to the Pune police, this closed the
matter -- the situation was 'under control'. Over 25 bakeries were attacked and
burned outside Pune, what was the police doing?
Now, in the peaceful atmosphere
that had by then descended on Pune, say the cops, this was a direct provocation
to the Hindu Rashtra Sena guys who were then zipping around on motorcycles
distributing offensive leaflets. So they killed Mohsin Shaikh. Hence, both the
stoning of the mosques and the lynching of Shaikh was part of a 'Hindu
backlash' to Muslim provocation (though the identity of the originator of the
FB post is still unknown). There is still no explanation for why Mohsin fell
prey and victim, however.
The Srikrishna Commission
demolished this 'backlash' theory put forward by the Mumbai police and the Shiv
Sena to justify the January 1993 Sena-led pogrom against Muslims. You don't
need a judicial commission to demolish the Pune 'backlash' theory. Eye-witness accounts
from the very first night of violence, May 30, show that the police chose to
ignore the vandalism of the Hindutva goons.
The moot question is, what and who helped
Dhananjay Desai spread his poison?
Ends
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.