December 22, 2014
Press Release
The Citizens for Justice and Peace, Mumbai expresses outrage at
the deliberate and vicious mis-reporting of the current witch
hunt at the instances of the Gujarat Police Crime Branch and as
scurrilously reported by dubious media channels like India TV,
IBN7 and newspapers like the Pioneer with clear links to
the ruling dispensation.
As states by us in repeated Press Statements since the lodging
of the False FIR against two functionaries, Teesta Setalvad and
Javed Anand as also three Survivors of the Gulberg Carnage of
2002 (Firoz Gulzar Pathan, Salim Sandhi and Tanveer Jafri), the
statements recorded by the Crime Branch (from December 15-20,
2014) as a consequence of the Order of the Gujarat High Court
dated December 5,2014 would in the normal course have been
recorded after the grant of anticipatory bail by the courts. The
application for ABA has been pending before the Gujarat High
Court since April and the High Court has in fact given all five
persons including the human rights defenders protection against
arrest.
The channels mentioned above, who’s questionable journalism has
extended to paid news benefitting certain interests have
deliberately wrongly reported that we have been “charged’ with
financial misconduct. A false and unsubstantiated FIR has not
resulted in any “evidence” and every false allegation has been
answered by us in detail.
As the statement released by CJP reproduced below shows, this is
nothing short of a witchunt of an inquiry to stymie the struggle
for justice for the Survivors of 2002. Malicious Lies
statement by CJP can be read at
http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?289781.
Another recent
report may be read at
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/
45526479.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
45526479.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Trustees:
I.M. Kadri, Nandan Maluste, Teesta Setalvad, Cyrus Guzder, Alyque Padamsee, Anil Dharker, Shakuntala Kulkarni, Javed Anand, Rahul Bose, Cedric Prakash
I.M. Kadri, Nandan Maluste, Teesta Setalvad, Cyrus Guzder, Alyque Padamsee, Anil Dharker, Shakuntala Kulkarni, Javed Anand, Rahul Bose, Cedric Prakash
Also Read:
Allegations against Teesta Javed Baseless
http://www.cjponline.org/prelease/19junel14.htm
http://www.cjponline.org/prelease/19junel14.htm
CJP Rebuts
Malafide allegation
http://www.cjponline.org/prelease/21mar14.htm
http://www.cjponline.org/prelease/21mar14.htm
Allegations
Baseless
http://www.cjponline.org/prelease/12mar14.htm
http://www.cjponline.org/prelease/12mar14.htm
Other
Statements In Support can be read at
www.cjponline.org
'The Citizens for Justice and Peace strongly condemns and
refutes the
malicious lies being spread by advocate for the State of
Gujarat Ajay Choksi in misleading the Court about the Citizens
for Justice and Peace “cheating” victims of the riots'
The Citizens for Justice and Peace strongly condemns and refutes
the
malicious lies being spread by advocate for the State of
Gujarat Ajay Choksi in misleading the Court about the Citizens
for Justice and Peace “cheating” victims of the riots.
The Secretary CJP Teesta Setalvad has filed a strong 41 page affidavit in rejoinder explaining point by point how baseless and malicious the allegations of the State are. The nexus of the Gujarat government headed by Narendra Modi, it’s Crime Branch headed by powerful policemen who have been collaborators of the regime since 2002 and Rais Khan Pathan a former employee of the Organisation who is being used as a proxy in this malicious war have also been exposed. Before this, too, Khan has been “aided” in his malicious efforts by senior legal functionaries who are politically in allegiance with the Gujarat government (in the Gujarat high Court and Supreme Court). He has now been cited as “witness” by the Crime Branch Ahmedabad in this false and malicious case. The timing of this “FIR” is revealing. A cooked up case has obviously been raked up to prevent an Appeal in the Smt Zakia Jafri v/s Narendra Modi Criminal Case. Shri Tanvir Jafri, son of Smt Zakia Jafri and the late Shri Ahsan Jafri has also been made a co-accused in the Criminal Complaint, a further sign of rank intimidation. Why is the Gujarat Government afraid of the higher Courts?
On behalf of herself and her husband Javed Anand, Teesta Setalvad has filed an affidavit in the Sessions Court in Ahmedabad, pointing out the gaping holes in the affidavit earlier filed by the crime branch of the Ahmedabad police in the same courts with bogus, false and mindless accusations against them for embezzling funds. Here below are some of the main points in the 41-page affidavit (attached with this press release) filed by her:
The Secretary CJP Teesta Setalvad has filed a strong 41 page affidavit in rejoinder explaining point by point how baseless and malicious the allegations of the State are. The nexus of the Gujarat government headed by Narendra Modi, it’s Crime Branch headed by powerful policemen who have been collaborators of the regime since 2002 and Rais Khan Pathan a former employee of the Organisation who is being used as a proxy in this malicious war have also been exposed. Before this, too, Khan has been “aided” in his malicious efforts by senior legal functionaries who are politically in allegiance with the Gujarat government (in the Gujarat high Court and Supreme Court). He has now been cited as “witness” by the Crime Branch Ahmedabad in this false and malicious case. The timing of this “FIR” is revealing. A cooked up case has obviously been raked up to prevent an Appeal in the Smt Zakia Jafri v/s Narendra Modi Criminal Case. Shri Tanvir Jafri, son of Smt Zakia Jafri and the late Shri Ahsan Jafri has also been made a co-accused in the Criminal Complaint, a further sign of rank intimidation. Why is the Gujarat Government afraid of the higher Courts?
On behalf of herself and her husband Javed Anand, Teesta Setalvad has filed an affidavit in the Sessions Court in Ahmedabad, pointing out the gaping holes in the affidavit earlier filed by the crime branch of the Ahmedabad police in the same courts with bogus, false and mindless accusations against them for embezzling funds. Here below are some of the main points in the 41-page affidavit (attached with this press release) filed by her:
1. The full of falsehood affidavit of the crime branch is
nothing short of intimidatory tactics with the ulterior motive
of brow-beating the organizations with which she is associated
with, and her and her husband personally, from pursuing the
course of justice for the victims survivors of the 2002 carnage
and punishment of the guilty, including those in high places. It
may be noted, that directly as a result of our efforts, till
date at least 117 accused have been convicted and given life
imprisonment. This includes former BJP MLA and minister in
Narendra Modi’s cabinet, Dr. Maya Kodnani.
2. The dubious intent of the crime branch among other things
evident from the fact that they have deliberately concealed the
fact in their affidavit that while the Ahmedabad-based
accomplice of the crime branch, Rais Khan, a disgruntled
ex-employee of Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) till
December 2007, was paid a total salary of Rs. 9,63,500, provided
free housing and a vehicle, Teesta Setalvad (who functioned as
chief executive) neither asked for, nor received a single rupee
as salary from the organisation between April 2002 (when CJP was
founded and December 2009 (nearly 8 years). Nor is there any
mention of the fact that unlike Rais Khan, she neither asked for
nor received any accommodation allowance.
3. With malicious intent, the crime branch has aggragated all
the donations and grants received by CJP and Sabrang Trust and
claimed that the entire amount was collected for the sole
purpose of proposed Gulberg Memorial. The fact is that till
date, while Sabrang Trust has in total received approximately Rs
4.5 lakh only earmarked by donors for the memorial, CJP did not
receive a single rupee for the same.
4. It has been alleged that a total of around Rs. 2.62 crore was
collected by Sabrang Trust between 10.4.2007 and 20.2.2014 for
the museum. This is a blatant falsehood for two reasons.
Firstly, a table contained in Teesta Setalvad’s affidavit where
the purpose for which the foreign contributions were strictly to
be used were clearly specified by the donors is clearly spelt
out, it is evident that only around Rs. 4.5 lakh in all was
earmarked by the donors for the Gulberg Memorial. This is easily
established through the donors’ letters. Moreover, several of
the donors have written to Sabrang Trust in the recent period,
stating that in view of insufficient funds being received for
the Gulberg memorial, Sabrang Trust is authorised to spend their
donations on other activities. Secondly, it is also evident from
the table that the total foreign contributions received by
Sabrang Trust totaled around Rs. 1.33 crore and NOT Rs. 2.62 as
falsely claimed by the crime branch. The highly exaggerated
figure is the result of a simple accounting subterfuge: Of the
total of Rs. 1.33 crore received over the relevant period, a
total of Rs. 1.21 crore were transferred from the trust’s
savings a/c to term deposits in the same bank with a view to
earning extra interest income for the trust. On maturity the
same deposits along with interest totalling around Rs. 1.26
crore were credited back into the savings account. In its
wisdom, or malafide intent, the crime branch has chosen to treat
this Rs. 1.26 crore as fresh income!!
5. It has been alleged that Teesta Setalvad got over Rs. 21.6
lakh from Sabrang Trust between 1.10.2009 and 30.6.2013.
Similarly, it has been alleged that Javed Anand received over Rs.
20 lakh from Sabrang Trust during the same period. Teesta
Setalvad’s affidavit clearly points out that were NOT paid this
or even part of this amount in their capacity as trustees of
Sabrang Trust. In fact, they were paid these amounts (averaging
to Rs. 48,000 p.m. in case of Teesta Setalvad and around 47,700
p.m. in case of Javed Anand) for discharging their duties as
Project Directors and Project Administrators as per the budget
approved by the Trustees of Sabrang Trust and sanctioned by the
donor organizations for specific projects having nothing to do
with the Gulberg Memorial.
6. It has been alleged that Rs 67 lakh odd “have been
transferred” to employees/ staff salaries etc. Teesta Setalvad’s
affidavit asks which organisation with large scale activities
such as those implemented by Sabrang Trust and CJP functions
without paid staff.
7. It has been alleged that over a 6 year period (between
12.4.2007 and 4.6.2013) a total of only Rs. 2,49,000 was spent
on legal aid from the non-FCRA account of CJP. This is purely a
figment of the crime branch’s twisted imagination. A detailed
year-by-year account provided by Teesta Setalvad shows that CJP
spent a total of over Rs 2 crore (100 times the crime branch’s
figure) on legal aid.
8. It is claimed that there was ‘Zero’ credits in the savings
accounts in UBI of both Teesta Setalvad and Javed Anand during
the entire calendar years in 2001 and 2002. The monthly bank
statements issued by the bank clearly show that a total of
approximately Rs. 18.8 lakh was credited (deposited) in the said
account of Teesta Setalvad during the relevant period. During
the same period, a total of over Rs 9.2 lakh was credited to the
said account of Javed Anand.
These and many such bogus and false charges have been rebutted
in detail in the affidavit filed by Teesta Setalvad. We enclose
it here for your reference. The method of “acquiring” details of
the individuals and Organisations involved in bonafide legal
activity simply to hamper the struggle for Justice and
Accountability have been illegal and intimidatory and have also
been questioned by Setalvad in her affidavit.
Trustees:
I.M. Kadri, Nandan Maluste, Teesta Setalvad, Cyrus Guzder, Javed Akhtar, Alyque Padamsee, Anil Dharker, Ghulam Pesh Imam, Javed Anand, Rahul Bose, Cedric Prakash
Trustees:
I.M. Kadri, Nandan Maluste, Teesta Setalvad, Cyrus Guzder, Javed Akhtar, Alyque Padamsee, Anil Dharker, Ghulam Pesh Imam, Javed Anand, Rahul Bose, Cedric Prakash
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.