Feb 13 2015 : The Economic Times
(Mumbai)
Stop
Harassment of Teesta Setalvad
Though the Supreme Court stayed the
arrest of human rights activist Teesta Setalvad in an alleged case of embezzlement,
and will hear the petition against the Gujarat High Court's refusal of
protection against possible arrest today , the whole case can be seen as the
targeting of an activist involved in cases relating to the 2002 carnage in
Gujarat. Indeed, even the very threat of arrest in such a case seems an extreme
measure and even harassment.
A cursory look at the timeline of
the allegations and cases against Setalvad and her associate and husband reveal
a pattern of state intimidation, even as cases like the 2002 killings at the
Gulberg Society in Ahmedabad continue to drag on. The charge against Setalvad,
misappropria tion of funds meant for a museum at the Gulberg Society site,
arose after a person complained to the Crime Branch in Ahm edabad. It was later
found the complaint had been sent on a forged letterhead, and when documents
were presented show ing that no wrongdoing had taken place, the Crime Branch
dropped the investigation. But the case has still been raked up again and
again.
Justice for communal riot victims
remains elusive in India, on the whole, marring our justice delivery system.
But Gujarat 2002 has seen some measure of justice: many perpetrators, including
a then-minister in the Modi regime, were convicted.Though all the victims
haven't had that justice, much of what was delivered happened due to the
courage of victims and activists like Setalvad in pursuing the cases despite
interminable delays and apparent state antipathy . The judiciary must ensure
that allegations like this are probed quickly , and do not become a tool for
harassment and intimidation of activists or anyone seeking justice against the
powerful or the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.